From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35687929E
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  4 May 2021 08:10:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C682223552
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  4 May 2021 08:10:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C27BD23541
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  4 May 2021 08:10:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D8E342A06
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  4 May 2021 08:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
References: <20210503093959.14855-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
 <20210503093959.14855-3-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <e340a683-8b1a-99cf-15be-9b3155edc16c@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:10:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210503093959.14855-3-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.281 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [REBASED v2 backup 2/9] add acme client
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 06:10:10 -0000

Stupid question, but why is http_client an Option?

On 5/3/21 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> T
> +pub struct AcmeClient {
> +    directory_url: String,
> +    debug: bool,
> +    account_path: Option<String>,
> +    tos: Option<String>,
> +    account: Option<Account>,
> +    directory: Option<Directory>,
> +    nonce: Option<String>,
> +    http_client: Option<SimpleHttp>,
> +}