From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 2/2] docs: deduplicate background details for garbage collection
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1aacd77-fbd5-49dd-8898-9195bad6ba8d@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jpebpvz446y4nicz55trxekiil77tbfncavtppanxgqzqjjfvl@2dfrb43gnpve>
On 11/14/24 10:39, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> On 13.11.2024 16:55, Christian Ebner wrote:
>> diff --git a/docs/maintenance.rst b/docs/maintenance.rst
>> index e8a26d69c..bba3feff4 100644
>> --- a/docs/maintenance.rst
>> +++ b/docs/maintenance.rst
>> @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ It's recommended to setup a schedule to ensure
>> that unused space is cleaned up
>> periodically. For most setups a weekly schedule provides a good
>> interval to
>> start.
>>
>> +.. _gc_background:
>> +
>> GC Background
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> @@ -222,17 +224,31 @@ datastore or interfering with other backups.
>> The garbage collection (GC) process is performed per datastore and is
>> split
>> into two phases:
>>
>> -- Phase one: Mark
>> - All index files are read, and the access time of the referred chunk
>> files is
>> - updated.
>> -
>> -- Phase two: Sweep
>> - The task iterates over all chunks, checks their file access time,
>> and if it
>> - is older than the cutoff time (i.e., the time when GC started, plus
>> some
>> - headroom for safety and Linux file system behavior), the task knows
>> that the
>> - chunk was neither referred to in any backup index nor part of any
>> currently
>> - running backup that has no index to scan for. As such, the chunk
>> can be
>> - safely deleted.
>> +- Phase one (Mark):
>> +
>> + All index files are read, and the access time (``atime``) of the
>> referenced
>> + chunk files is updated.
>> +
>> +- Phase two (Sweep):
>> +
>> + The task iterates over all chunks and checks their file access time
>> against a
>> + cutoff time. The cutoff time is given by either the oldest backup
>> writer
>> + instance, if present, or 24 hours and 5 minutes after the start of
>> garbage
>> + collection.
>> +
>
>> + Garbage collection can consider chunk files with access time older
>> than the
>
> s/can consider/considers/
Acked!
> It always considers chunks with atime older than cutoff to be dangling
> afaik.
This part here is referring to the second phase, so cleaning up the
chunks. Or what do you mean here by dangling?
>
>> + cutoff time to be neither referenced by any backup snapshot's
>> index, nor part
>> + of any currently running backup job. Therefore, these chunks can
>> safeley be
>> + deleted.
>
> s/safeley/safely/
Acked!
>
>> +
>> + Chunks within the grace period will not be deleted and logged at
>> the end of
>> + the garbage collection task as *Pending removals*.
>> +
>> +.. note:: The grace period for backup chunk removal is not arbitrary,
>> but stems
>> + from the fact that filesystems are typically mounted with the
>> ``relatime``
>> + option by default. This results in better performance by only
>> updating the
>> + ``atime`` property if a file has been modified since the last
>> access or the
>> + last access has been at least 24 hours ago.
>>
>> Manually Starting GC
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Otherwise this is great!
Thx, will fold in your comments and send a new version
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 15:55 [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: add security implications of prune and change detection mode Christian Ebner
2024-11-13 15:55 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 2/2] docs: deduplicate background details for garbage collection Christian Ebner
2024-11-14 9:39 ` Gabriel Goller
2024-11-14 9:47 ` Christian Ebner [this message]
2024-11-14 10:23 ` Gabriel Goller
2024-11-14 9:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] docs: add security implications of prune and change detection mode Gabriel Goller
2024-11-14 9:43 ` Christian Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1aacd77-fbd5-49dd-8898-9195bad6ba8d@proxmox.com \
--to=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox