From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C002A640CF for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD5C51F847 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:49:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e2i461.smtp2go.com (e2i461.smtp2go.com [103.2.141.205]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 28AE01F83A for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:49:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpservice.net; s=m6dg70.a1-4.dyn; x=1601917487; h=Feedback-ID: X-Smtpcorp-Track:Date:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:Sender: List-Unsubscribe; bh=2cdMQLS5MFO6JFB6CsxHvf3+jigwKEqAAEyuy9G0nqI=; b=q14Gt+kE qxhiilD5SrKnvYmz2FCzor2Kf/RMOEOzUYYy2qMlT9jg915G5Bn5c4ETvJJWHf8lgQ6GYoF/Foo7+ KceydB9SOvE25qSSFHenl0jVVLq1Zb8aJFmNwfmFesF5TZdQikr1A6zAluWY3WAXlNoVJxSX8/g/6 XC4i1lL3QxT5imxWgYihSSNtrl5eEM2KYQoLy8Ok+fQ0PuDJclShpeHdtImYKusrqBkR65G6gY9uY MvDq82UUTYwXFYbwoKuqitIseqRtMehmFsjdB2aRYkjXMMZnhEZJctffLu3m6Ui8Xf0c3NeAkyIOx vbLBPdRYwGhYIxbQbaoJz6ksKg==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=graemes.com; i=@graemes.com; q=dns/txt; s=s297367; t=1601916587; h=from : subject : to : message-id : date; bh=2cdMQLS5MFO6JFB6CsxHvf3+jigwKEqAAEyuy9G0nqI=; b=HF9srGE+s+XhYtVT/Z4Ygryv8tW8QOnWErajvWp6Kb+mBKWweD9ib/A83hFrN7HCfifww HTA7QrLR/sQPm7meOJXq1UHAqnOI/tUyBlsYk3Y7J5CQSMr/IKaLsOZR2H8EjFETXaKFHOg O3z8b42Qm8Az9xxgbiudT1sapuYLUH3cqN1EQtQXrBVlgc8o6GVg+GjcE0swv06Py/i9JZf 1ob2YN1rRh92U3E132nQKa6VanZUNnBsjdaXUiKWhhaJurIC3xcC5YvIx6Sayvswi4zc12P cQ3vV0s8mGocUGIDTm9QNR+GADbztzKKG43lZLpSv8YjCrJ7XzowODgq71uw== Received: from [10.176.58.103] (helo=SmtpCorp) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kPTgI-cp4YnN-BX; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:49:46 +0000 Received: from [10.83.151.206] (helo=zappa.graemes.com) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kPTgI-9EFMxu-48; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:49:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.7.2] (duke.graemes.com [192.168.7.2]) (Authenticated sender: lists) by zappa.graemes.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59084C00449F0; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:49:45 +0100 (BST) To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <7072d246-960d-1d1b-be3f-04edb39e8033@graemes.com> <32fe64ea-90b4-abb4-85e9-324420e9776c@proxmox.com> <5e238f85-d7b0-4cef-13d8-aa2e6012a61e@graemes.com> From: Graeme Seaton Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:49:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 59084C00449F0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.10 / 20.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.59422823060935]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%] X-Rspamd-Server: zappa.graemes.com X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1keTgm9EFuxI48.-B6rf8c9x6m17 Feedback-ID: 297367m:297367aJZwe00:297367s9kNZG5NGf X-Report-Abuse: Please forward a copy of this message, including all headers, to X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.262 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIMWL_WL_MED -0.001 DKIMwl.org - Medium trust sender DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Templates starting on backup X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:50:18 -0000 The reason I moved them was that my sense of taste didn't like having the templates intermingled with the running hosts in the server view ;-) Having all of the templates stored on a single host also provides a very simplistic way of making sure the running VM's are backed up as quickly as possible without being delayed by templates on the same server.  Being on a single host means that the templates are backed up on a single separate 'thread'.  I could probably achieve something similar by placing all of the templates in a very high id range. No biggie - just thought I'd feed back about the failures. Regards, Graeme On 05/10/2020 15:40, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 05.10.20 16:21, Graeme Seaton wrote: >> On 05/10/2020 14:42, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >>> What HW differences are talking here? >> In one case CPU type/Numa/hugepages.  In others vmbr's. > Why not just leave it at the "OK" hosts, if you're using HA you could > add it to a group restricted to those hosts it is compatible with. > > We may reduce the configuration of a template started fort backup a bit, > though. > > cheers, > Thomas > >