From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6CB9C7B2
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 23FA49C8F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:32:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4C68744B86
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:32:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <dc0cc081-ee54-4016-af3f-9a372faba9d1@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:32:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231023154302.2558918-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <20231023154302.2558918-2-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
 <54f6b050-02ce-4443-a3f3-e28ee2b875bd@proxmox.com>
 <fb844e0d-26ad-4a7c-a8e5-5d99c29c7b01@proxmox.com>
 <d9a94b91-e13a-470e-87c9-a600d7cb9d10@proxmox.com>
From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <d9a94b91-e13a-470e-87c9-a600d7cb9d10@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.070 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/3] fix #4315: jobs: modify
 GroupFilter so include/exclude is tracked
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:32:43 -0000



On 10/24/23 12:43, Lukas Wagner wrote:

> Do you have any examples in mind that would be more difficult to
> represent?

I would like to include all vms from 10 to to 30, but not 17,18 and 20.

> 
> If you keep it as it is right now, there should be a way to reorder
> match rules in the UI, maybe similar to the boot-order drag'n'drop
> thing in PVE.
> 

Yes. I spoke with Dominik Csapak about it. A new UI element to easily
re-sort the filters is planned but since it will be quite a bit of
work it is planned as a new patch.