From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dea@corep.it>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF976982B6
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 681721C1E4
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.corep.it (mail.corep.it [93.186.252.128])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <d262b57d-ff19-8946-007c-051f4e326fb9@corep.it>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:16:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
From: dea <dea@corep.it>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <7ab47597-6ed5-f577-49b5-c011b67ad1a8@corep.it>
 <37b93c67-fbae-3736-26a2-9ff3af7dc4fd@corep.it>
 <d18c1576-0eba-ee9c-281b-9b7e23ce1c89@proxmox.com>
 <e9f18faf-d7d1-ba40-c517-b7902a669fee@corep.it>
In-Reply-To: <e9f18faf-d7d1-ba40-c517-b7902a669fee@corep.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.864 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A            -1.22 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Possible problem on NFS storage with release 2-3-3
 (??)
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:17:08 -0000

Hi Thomas,

I can confirm a kernel problem in my server.

Now, on kernel 6.2.6 (Enterprise repository) PBS is much faster (running 
on 2.4-1)

Thanks

Luca