From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.carrara@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6E8B810F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 18:30:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EFDB01CD76
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 18:29:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 18:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 402AF48847
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 18:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c3fbb857-e4b9-435b-8e3e-0e883196298e@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:29:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20240306141153.419283-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Max Carrara <m.carrara@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240306141153.419283-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 0/3] fix #5285: log global
 statistics for sync job
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 17:30:20 -0000

On 3/6/24 15:11, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Adds a global summary of the transferred chunk size and count, as well
> as the average transfer rate of a sync job to it's task log.
> 
> Patch 1/3 introduces a PullStats object, used to return the relevant
> data from each pull related method call.
> 
> Patch 2/3 adds the summary log line to the tasklog.
> 
> Patch 3/3 finally adapts the current log output to use the
> functionality of `HumanByte` to produce consistent output.
> 
> Tested by creating a local sync job and syncing a datastore, checking
> the output in the tasklog.
> Chunk counts where compared to `find .chunks -type f -print | wc -l`.
> 
> Bugtracker link:
> https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5285
> 
> Christian Ebner (3):
>   server: sync: return `PullStats` for pull related methods
>   fix #5285: api: sync: add job summary to task log
>   server: sync: use HumanByte for task log output
> 
>  src/api2/pull.rs   |  12 ++++-
>  src/server/pull.rs | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 

Looks pretty good to me!

* The patches are very straightforward and easy to follow.
* Code is formatted with `cargo fmt`.
* `cargo clippy` doesn't complain about your changes either.

Unfortunately didn't get around to testing it just yet due to the
proxmox-schema changes (as you spotted off-list already), so will
do that as soon as that's sorted out.

Can't complain otherwise, very clean!

Reviewed-By: Max Carrara <m.carrara@proxmox.com>