From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6EF663139
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:14:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C4824206FD
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:14:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 421DB206F2
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:14:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B7DC416B5
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:14:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <c1f0410f-1ae1-8510-00e1-d51445abb1ca@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:14:28 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/98.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20220210142325.2595867-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220210142325.2595867-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 1/2] fix
 #3853: api: add force option to tape key change-passphrase
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:14:29 -0000

On 10.02.22 15:23, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> When force is used, the current passphrase is not required. Instead
> it will be read from the file pointed to by TAPE_KEYS_FILENAME and
> the old key configuration will be overwritten using the new
> passphrase. Requires super user privileges.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: check for root privileges moved into the api endpoint, better
> descriptions and errors strings and incorporated some nitpicks.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback to Thomas Lamprecht, Dominik Csapak, and 
> Wolfgang Bumiller. 
> 
>  src/api2/config/tape_encryption_keys.rs | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied series, thanks!