From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25506D187
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:04:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE5981E223
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:04:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 01E161E214
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:04:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC69044AF1
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:04:18 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <b12c5644-a09d-0b70-5179-4fd7796633e8@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:03:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210831134825.581949-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210831134825.581949-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.250 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] tools: smart: only
 throw error for smartctl fatal errors
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:04:55 -0000

On 31.08.21 15:48, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> only bit 0-2 are fatal errors, bit 3-7 are used to indicate
> some drive conditions. for details see the manpage of smartctl(8)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> reported in the forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/s-m-a-r-t-status-unknown.95417/
> 
>  src/tools/disks/smart.rs | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

fyi: as run_command moved to a sub-crate I had to resolve a trivial merge conflict.