From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5DF90745
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 08:47:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B82313738
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 08:47:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 08:47:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 19277439EA;
 Mon,  2 Oct 2023 08:47:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <af0292b4-5f53-4f95-a94a-b9eb64568016@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 08:47:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
References: <20230929133924.2731714-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20230929133924.2731714-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <5e3da8e2-d656-3c5d-5630-307807ce079d@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e3da8e2-d656-3c5d-5630-307807ce079d@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.011 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] fix #4977: ui: tape:
 restore: rework snapshot selection logic
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 06:47:56 -0000

On 9/29/23 17:30, Mira Limbeck wrote:
> I've tested it here and ran into an issue.
> When you select a target namespace for one datastore, and none for the
> other, the snapshots that are mapped to the root namespace won't be
> restored, with the following warning:
> 
> 
> 2023-09-29T17:25:23+02:00: WARN: could not find target namespace for
> test:vm/100/2023-01-24T10:47:49Z
> 

thanks for the review!

while that behaviour is unexpected (and i'll see to it that i fix it in the
gui) it's not really related to this fix and it behaved like that before too.