From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D9E722DE
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 07:53:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBE6F28630
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 07:53:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CD1BC28621
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 07:52:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9CF3543E47
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 07:52:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <ae194062-50f3-0c34-87d9-ec5ed4296821@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 07:52:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210512144232.5643-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210512144232.5643-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] ui: add node options
 under 'Configuration -> Options'
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 05:53:00 -0000

On 12.05.21 16:42, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> for now only http-proxy lives there, but we will add more options later,
> such as
> * email from
> * default gui language
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/Makefile                 |  1 +
>  www/SystemConfiguration.js   |  5 +++++
>  www/config/NodeOptionView.js | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 www/config/NodeOptionView.js
> 
>

applied, thanks! But reworked it to a more static declaration in and avoided
introducing the slightly weird, over-general `Configuration -> Options` tab,
I just added it to the existing `Authentication` one for now, fits there OK
enough and solving the Configuration/Administration weirdness needs more thought
and a major release, as I'd like to avoid reshuffling components in a stable one.