From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95FF168BBA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C70318E78 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0F5A018E6D for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D65CC41CDB for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:20:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:20:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <20220303150326.211523-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <3269938a-6887-5dcd-bcde-fb158b7f15ab@proxmox.com> <963d159c-ebe2-e380-54ce-ff619c735364@proxmox.com> From: Stefan Sterz In-Reply-To: <963d159c-ebe2-e380-54ce-ff619c735364@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 1/1] ui: make panels in the dashboard all the same height X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:20:35 -0000 On 10.03.22 11:15, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 10.03.22 11:13, Stefan Sterz wrote: >> On 10.03.22 10:31, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >>> On 03.03.22 16:03, Stefan Sterz wrote: >>>> this fixes an issue where the layout looks misaligned in three column >>>> layouts >>>> >>> >>> imo it makes the layout look worse in the two column layout as there's a lot >>> of empty, odd looking space in the "Task Summary" and "Subscription" card. >>> >>> We could only change the running/longest task one, that'd fix the biggest >>> problem with the three column mode and still looks nice in the two-column >>> mode - what do you think? >>> >> >> yes they do look a bit awkward, if we fix both the longest and running >> tasks panels that works for me too. we could also set the height to >> 270 instead of 280, that would mean we have almost the same vertical >> height as before overall (off by 10) and it would make the >> "uptime/stats" look a bit nicer imho (getting rid of the whitespace >> "chin"). ill send a patch for that in a sec. > > note that different translations can mean a line break in the stats panel, > IIRC that chin is there on purpose. yeah, you are right. i can send a v3 (sorry for the spam). i'd like to point out though that in e.g. arabic even 280 is not enough. arabic would require something closer to 320 to be displayed nicely.