From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0301D1FF15C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Apr 2025 18:11:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9BA493701B;
	Fri,  4 Apr 2025 18:10:28 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:10:23 +0200
Message-Id: <D8XZHQ4ZNKKW.EQ205T9KDY20@proxmox.com>
To: "Christian Ebner" <c.ebner@proxmox.com>, "Proxmox Backup Server
 development discussion" <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: "Max Carrara" <m.carrara@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.18.2-0-ge037c095a049
References: <20250321080254.68931-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <D8XYVB5LZNPU.2RLYD2N5TSG9N@proxmox.com>
 <67b05d9d-3c5f-4d1d-9582-80cadc9370c8@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <67b05d9d-3c5f-4d1d-9582-80cadc9370c8@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.080 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v8 proxmox proxmox-backup 0/9] fix #5982:
 check atime update is honored
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri Apr 4, 2025 at 5:56 PM CEST, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Thanks for your throw review an for catching the permission issue! I 
> will have a closer look at this over the weekend and send a new version 
> (as I have to leave now). But this should be fixed rather easily by 
> either setting the ownership of the chunk after insert in the 
> corresponding code path or add a dedicated helper just for insertion of 
> the marker chunk, which takes care of that.
>
> And to quickly answer your question regarding noatime: yes, the 
> utimensat call bypasses all of these fs options, it is therefore rather 
> neat for our use case. But there are some filesystems out there (as of 
> reports in the community forum and enterprise repository) which do not 
> handle the atime updates as expected. Therefore the path. And no, 
> unfortunately I also have no filesystem which does not honor this for 
> testing.

Alright, sounds all good to me! I'll give the refresh another spin on
Wednesday then, as Mon and Tue are my uni days.


_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel