From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F3197811
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D586153C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4391A41860
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:08:10 +0200
Message-Id: <D0MA2OPK3TWK.39IYYBBD5T7NI@proxmox.com>
From: "Hannes Laimer" <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
To: "Christian Ebner" <c.ebner@proxmox.com>, "Proxmox Backup Server
 development discussion" <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0-78-g4ffbaa6b3946
References: <20240416152416.96561-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <20240416152416.96561-10-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <ba1e1f16-9b3c-4952-92a1-aa37c9de40fc@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <ba1e1f16-9b3c-4952-92a1-aa37c9de40fc@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v4 09/22] pbs-api-types:
 datastore: use new proxmox_schema::de for deserialization
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:08:12 -0000

On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 10:13 AM CEST, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Still not to happy about the commit title, but no hurt feelings

actually we don't even need this anymore for this series, but yes,
missed it, no reason for not changing the message