From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2C996871
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E550B17272
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CA5A45433
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:11 +0200
Message-Id: <D0LG2CV3ONM9.WM2AEAILP5GY@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox Backup Server development discussion"
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: "Gabriel Goller" <g.goller@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0-91-g65332c233880-dirty
References: <20240412100631.94218-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
 <20240412100631.94218-15-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240412100631.94218-15-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.085 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 14/33] server: notifications:
 send GC notifications via notification system
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:37:43 -0000

On Fri Apr 12, 2024 at 12:06 PM CEST, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> diff --git a/src/server/gc_job.rs b/src/server/gc_job.rs
> index 41375d72..ff5bdccf 100644
> --- a/src/server/gc_job.rs
> +++ b/src/server/gc_job.rs
> @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ pub fn do_garbage_collection_job(
>  ) -> Result<String, Error> {
>      let store =3D datastore.name().to_string();
> =20
> -    let (email, notify) =3D crate::server::lookup_datastore_notify_setti=
ngs(&store);
> -
>      let worker_type =3D job.jobtype().to_string();
>      let upid_str =3D WorkerTask::new_thread(
>          &worker_type,
> @@ -43,11 +41,9 @@ pub fn do_garbage_collection_job(
>                  eprintln!("could not finish job state for {}: {err}", jo=
b.jobtype());
>              }
> =20
> -            if let Some(email) =3D email {
> -                let gc_status =3D datastore.last_gc_status();
> -                if let Err(err) =3D send_gc_status(&email, notify, &stor=
e, &gc_status, &result) {
> -                    eprintln!("send gc notification failed: {err}");
> -                }
> +            let gc_status =3D datastore.last_gc_status();
> +            if let Err(err) =3D send_gc_status(&store, &gc_status, &resu=
lt) {
> +                eprintln!("send gc notification failed: {err}");

I think we should use 'task_err!()' here. I know eprintln is used above,
and technically works because we redirect stderr in the service setup=20
but it's still slow and kinda the legacy method of printing task errors.

>              }
> =20
>              result