From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2C996871 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E550B17272 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CA5A45433 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:37:11 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Proxmox Backup Server development discussion" From: "Gabriel Goller" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0-91-g65332c233880-dirty References: <20240412100631.94218-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20240412100631.94218-15-l.wagner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240412100631.94218-15-l.wagner@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.085 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 14/33] server: notifications: send GC notifications via notification system X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:37:43 -0000 On Fri Apr 12, 2024 at 12:06 PM CEST, Lukas Wagner wrote: > diff --git a/src/server/gc_job.rs b/src/server/gc_job.rs > index 41375d72..ff5bdccf 100644 > --- a/src/server/gc_job.rs > +++ b/src/server/gc_job.rs > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ pub fn do_garbage_collection_job( > ) -> Result { > let store =3D datastore.name().to_string(); > =20 > - let (email, notify) =3D crate::server::lookup_datastore_notify_setti= ngs(&store); > - > let worker_type =3D job.jobtype().to_string(); > let upid_str =3D WorkerTask::new_thread( > &worker_type, > @@ -43,11 +41,9 @@ pub fn do_garbage_collection_job( > eprintln!("could not finish job state for {}: {err}", jo= b.jobtype()); > } > =20 > - if let Some(email) =3D email { > - let gc_status =3D datastore.last_gc_status(); > - if let Err(err) =3D send_gc_status(&email, notify, &stor= e, &gc_status, &result) { > - eprintln!("send gc notification failed: {err}"); > - } > + let gc_status =3D datastore.last_gc_status(); > + if let Err(err) =3D send_gc_status(&store, &gc_status, &resu= lt) { > + eprintln!("send gc notification failed: {err}"); I think we should use 'task_err!()' here. I know eprintln is used above, and technically works because we redirect stderr in the service setup=20 but it's still slow and kinda the legacy method of printing task errors. > } > =20 > result