From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ronja.mits.lan by ronja.mits.lan with LMTP id m6qQNpTPdGYGNgAAxxbTJA (envelope-from ); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:55:48 +0200 Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (unknown [192.168.2.33]) by ronja.mits.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1AC5F645D5; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9161743AD2; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A3F731EA04; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:55:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718931304; x=1719536104; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CBQs6IBelauwLAsmgyv+7H7YwLeEoBQT5/IgUpXyUI4=; b=Dn3PYh5FeD2oNeXD5NAbY+jxwAmabjLcCoCs+GLv/aB8cDwasDV7M5ybDYUwJXJxWQ Vyp0jRZqER/ZZ9e7DJNwhyUl+Ogp4iQmDQv2cP2qiZWjDipEfnpW3L+9pvJXOfgy1OPo 8prwuypqBSy9av8PTqNuPzd0ye4hvcS/P5ciQEJogbwjLpX9udPyr3QVYyrVzqM/8DyD PXRflTH9HizKPf7ChNniw7sXjcyMroSmxuB7OhhPkdSvtvLWrxWEIu2STS9MQ/3rxz8M UgR4iZy+bi948GrFmKrWmL7/XfGYHRWCoIoJ8sLtGdjCDfbubgzSuKYDOU7hZnI1Nyqy QOLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718931304; x=1719536104; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CBQs6IBelauwLAsmgyv+7H7YwLeEoBQT5/IgUpXyUI4=; b=IlkgnR+jQxDT0JtkEflhj9pREJvbkurgkyfU+8gk05uSv3vq2G4BnRs9nEc64TV0QF WtZxnqTAld/QON7101T63n9O1eKLGw3TWukdUdnbCa0O243/yF6SHEaDD1YDrJN+YCbl 4ONskRtAQ/A2XJlAWe/rdl3NCe9V8Qh+txngEBOCTC4HFPTDGlXK//Nryo7Az/jaQo/E TEqTCSZRBJbhEsB4xO5La/ggoTpiwK2ehL9SOpeFSsZP2TA92S5TbAHgeFaBldTLKGGQ nUvuUZwAA/5claJbJ3WXfSk9BD8h1Rp6VRv+tVafvTn34lwBaCH2Zdt8Grb3p3Y5sIcE 8KdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyFxNh/mBNgfSUVXWfpN9319bzxkeiSQ8W0PFII6bGQxBLq6GWR XSEa1EN931VVOfIIuvuV2BzhpQyuDbiQCQFHBlC2ZZnPZNrHR1KlreNvRYk+VIvcsHnUhm9EfYm Mo+4P0NriVQYw00MAc7WE9a7IQVNHDxNjD5Ew9gQwEdU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGG1D8TwJsLbqvMxk0ar6azciss5duFHnjEp+lbPLa1y3QarohRqC3RriGYmQe5NRGSn74Rdr8KdTSxhL+H/aQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e390:b0:2c2:d0b7:9a24 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c7b5cc6e6cmr6277024a91.27.1718931304113; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:55:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Turkijan Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:51:52 -0700 Message-ID: To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Subject: [pbs-devel] Installing proxmox-debian-registry build error. X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6805323328294455704==" Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.001 No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED DKIM_INVALID 0.1 DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DMARC_NONE 0.1 DMARC none policy FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider GB_FREEMAIL_NUM 1 Freemail spammy address GB_GMAIL_NUM 2 Spam from random Gmail address HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_NONE 0.25 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment MAILING_LIST_MULTI -2 Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - --===============6805323328294455704== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c66d6b061b5be114" --000000000000c66d6b061b5be114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" root@debian:/proxmox-backup# sudo mk-build-deps -ir I ran this command but faced issue. mk-build-deps: Unable to install rust-proxmox-backup-build-deps at /usr/bin/mk-build-deps line 459. mk-build-deps: Unable to install all build-dep packages I haven't faced this issues before but I setup new debian and installing this. What is this issue related in? --000000000000c66d6b061b5be114 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0 root@debian:/proxmox-backup# sudo mk-build-deps -ir= =C2=A0

I ran this command but faced issue.=C2=A0

mk-build-deps: Unable to install rust-proxmox-backup-buil= d-deps at /usr/bin/mk-build-deps line 459. mk-build-deps:=C2=A0
Unable to install all build-dep packages=C2= =A0=C2=A0

I haven't faced this issues befo= re but I setup new debian and installing this.
What is this issue= related in?
--000000000000c66d6b061b5be114-- --===============6805323328294455704== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel --===============6805323328294455704==--