From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24460707A6
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:07:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 061FAF5F5
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:07:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9F29DF5E7
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:07:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 744DD44528
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:07:25 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <9477a302-add1-29bb-94d5-bc54490d9465@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:07:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210929070420.617226-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20210929070420.617226-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210929070420.617226-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.860 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A            -3.03 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 4/4] fixup! rest-server:
 use hypers AddrIncoming for proxmox-backup-api
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:07:56 -0000

sorry i did miss a
'git rebase -i master --autosquash' before sending... should i send a v4 
for that?