From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9FC1FF38D for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 17:31:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7AE3B41D4; Fri, 3 May 2024 17:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <8798da2f-5fb6-4570-9b9b-23e81fee2555@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 17:31:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Christian Ebner To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Gabriel Goller References: <20240503142933.171798-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <1696409104.14075.1714747792149@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE In-Reply-To: <1696409104.14075.1714747792149@webmail.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] config: add default datastore creation function X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On 5/3/24 16:49, Christian Ebner wrote: >> On 03.05.2024 16:32 CEST Gabriel Goller wrote: >> >> >> I am sure this has been discussed before, but couldn't find anything on >> the mailing list: Why don't we create a default verify job? >> >> It seems sensible to me to add a default verify job that runs once a >> week or once a month to every datastore (at least those created through >> the UI). > > Without having looked at your patches yet, there has been some patches and discussion on this which you can find here https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/2023-November/007342.html Forgot to answer your question: verify jobs can be very IO intensive and the user might even not want to have one, e.g. if data integrity is provided by other means. So this is better set up manually. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel