From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E63D92134
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  5 Apr 2024 10:06:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E4150F241
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  5 Apr 2024 10:06:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  5 Apr 2024 10:06:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F92845865;
 Fri,  5 Apr 2024 10:06:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Lendl <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox Backup Server
 development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d4f7803-d85b-4f30-bccb-5bb77fba1dca@proxmox.com>
References: <20240404095151.184141-1-s.lendl@proxmox.com>
 <20240404095151.184141-3-s.lendl@proxmox.com>
 <5d4f7803-d85b-4f30-bccb-5bb77fba1dca@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 10:06:50 +0200
Message-ID: <875xwwjkrp.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v3 1/9] form: include vlan
 field widget from PVE
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:06:52 -0000

Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> writes:

> I guess this can be ignored over the re-send that includes widget-toolkit
> and cover-letter:
>
> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/2024-April/008339.html

Yes please.