From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2638D6746E for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06926FAAD for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 635D3FAA0 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1872FA4010A; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id s7OZ7XrOu08p; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AE7A4036A; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.panservice.it Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id N_JjxVSUXJK5; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EBFA4010A; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:26:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabrizio Cuseo Reply-To: Fabrizio Cuseo To: pbs-devel Message-ID: <817775127.98335.1598444804482.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> In-Reply-To: <756044694.61.1598368328815@webmail.proxmox.com> References: <526549844.77739.1598365340730.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <756044694.61.1598368328815@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [212.66.96.48] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC84 (Win)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm Thread-Index: jt1SH79/8L7nosUvB5oEDUw7kARixA== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:26:46 -0000 There is something strange.. Vanilla CentOS 4.9 (32 bit), backup, restore, fsck, no problem I have copied (rsync) the content of my old centos 4.9 machine (but rsync, so the filesystem is new and clean) to the vanilla 4.9 Backup, restore, some problems with fsck Backup (powered off), restore, power on, reset, power on, fsck, problems with fsck Seems that during backup (and restore) something goes wrong with filesystem... The vm is on ceph with virtio drivers. Regards, Fabrizio ----- Il 25-ago-20, alle 17:12, Dietmar Maurer dietmar@proxmox.com ha scritto: >> I have a problem with a 4.9 centOS vm. If i restore after backup, during the >> initial FSCK there are a lot of errors and filesystem problems. >> >> I have tried to: >> - change disk from virtio to IDE >> - backup with vm off >> - make fsck, stop the vm, backup, and restore >> >> If i backup the vm powered off, when I restore it, no fsck is prompted at boot, >> but if I reset (without any activity) the vm, again the filesystem is full of >> errors. >> If I reset the original VM, no problem during fsck at boot. >> >> If i fix the restored vm, I backup it again (powered on or off), same problem. >> >> So seems the the problem is making and restoring backup. >> >> No problem with a centOS 6.X (i am testing other OS versions). >> >> Some idea ? > > file system on centos 4.9 is buggy (old xfs version)? --