From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A91714E5
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:02:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A71252E067
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:01:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 80B462E056
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 486594447F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <80dc2af6-c84d-0de5-79b5-7a9787b6c449@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:01:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20210628162741.74992-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
 <20210628162741.74992-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210628162741.74992-3-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.463 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.765 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] acme: plugin: add sleep
 for dns propagation
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:02:27 -0000

"fix #3496: ..." 

On 28.06.21 18:27, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> the dns plugin config allow for a specified amount of time to wait for
> the TXT record to be set and propagated through DNS.
> 
> This patch adds a sleep for this amount of time.
> The log message was taken from the perl implementation in proxmox-acme
> for consistency.
> 
> Tested with the powerdns plugin in my test setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/acme/plugin.rs | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/acme/plugin.rs b/src/acme/plugin.rs
> index 5e0e547a..96f64b7d 100644
> --- a/src/acme/plugin.rs
> +++ b/src/acme/plugin.rs
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ use std::future::Future;
>  use std::pin::Pin;
>  use std::process::Stdio;
>  use std::sync::Arc;
> +use std::time::Duration;
>  
>  use anyhow::{bail, format_err, Error};
>  use hyper::{Body, Request, Response};
> @@ -168,6 +169,13 @@ impl DnsPlugin {
>              );
>          }
>  
> +        let validation_delay = self.core.validation_delay.unwrap_or(30) as u64;

misses the `if validation_delay > 0 {` for consistency with PVE and PMG.

> +        task.log(format!(
> +            "Sleeping {} seconds to wait for TXT record propagation",
> +            validation_delay
> +        ));
> +        tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_secs(validation_delay)).await;
> +

This now adds the delay on every action, not only on "setup" like in PVE/PMG - makes
no sense to do so for teardown...

>          Ok(&challenge.url)
>      }
>  }
>