From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC23692961
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A3A897101
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:17:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:17:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CA4014457F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:17:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:17:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, 
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <79477607.4810.1712567820164@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1712566705.if9kdm81q4.astroid@yuna.none>
References: <20240328123707.336951-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20240328123707.336951-17-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <1712566705.if9kdm81q4.astroid@yuna.none>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev61
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 16/58] client:
 backup writer: only borrow http client
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:17:31 -0000

> On 08.04.2024 11:04 CEST Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.=
com> wrote:
>=20
> =20
> this one is independent from the rest, applied already, thanks :)
>=20
> in general it's helpful to order such patches first - increases the
> chances of them being applied, since then it's obvious that they don't
> include side-effects from earlier patches ;)
>=20

Noted, thx!