From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3702471565
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B86B2411B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 115F62410D
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D37FA4349C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <71c20cf9-1b6e-119f-1183-d7d69ffb3797@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/101.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20220511140635.87279-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220511140635.87279-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup 0/5] update and
 improve sysadmin documenation
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:14:42 -0000

Am 5/11/22 um 16:06 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov:
> This patchset started from #3761 (adding kernel-pinning).
> 
> I skimmed through the docs - fixed a few things which seemed not too
> fitting for PBS
> 
> else the chapter for system-booting is taken from pve-docs (with new
> screenshots) and translated (more or less) mechanically to reST.
> 
> Currently planning on similarly copying and adapting the certificate
> documentation.
> 
> In the long run I think it'd make sense to have a common docs repo
> (proxmox-docs) for things that our products share (zfs, the acme
> part of the certificate documentation) and just include the files.
> (after some preprocessing and for the time being conversion
> reST->asciidoc)
> 
> Stoiko Ivanov (5):
>   docs: sysadmin: adapt kernel-specifics for PBS
>   docs: add system-booting from pve-docs
>   docs: system-booting: (re)add screenshots
>   docs: local-zfs: minor cleanup and adaptation
>   docs: zfs: update documentation about ZED

applied, thanks!