From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D70863904 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:16:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 342B11A30E for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:16:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e2i461.smtp2go.com (e2i461.smtp2go.com [103.2.141.205]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6F4751A301 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:16:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpservice.net; s=m6dg70.a1-4.dyn; x=1601901066; h=Feedback-ID: X-Smtpcorp-Track:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Reply-To:Sender: List-Unsubscribe; bh=lQxGlAj4MJyhFWt+umdcxJUC4e3UsmtUO1a/GCp9eqM=; b=CakDyWYr /wCoDAEOXHN+b2giQmE56rAYxbGQz5+6l78C0wOYmdrmhOYEvF7EVlxuWB4B0RsxmHvmUiu2o5M8/ lGeEPt5Oa0azD29xgsM8li1t5/ZUAz7pXV1kK73e4v8WEMunzpbWt/tvKHohcOrICst2MGjg4uv+l FHVHdDvTWjxv+qvNiuN7hgzvyA+mYP/J/YYA5zOrQ505buin09clrIjFFDd8pavzrELBz9haJDZrG 5KebMwAVE4LZafD5iAq5inTN2AtpfzxGQSPqsEcGQLvCdPe+QVrBALH9jWsuJir8/OvZ2oE7alm0O +9GDc48MDlDJRhgSKJ8VL+UNjw==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=graemes.com; i=@graemes.com; q=dns/txt; s=s297367; t=1601900166; h=from : subject : to : message-id : date; bh=lQxGlAj4MJyhFWt+umdcxJUC4e3UsmtUO1a/GCp9eqM=; b=MVLFLgYq8bVLw1wesoPtJVCBzKmqGRCMei3OJbW9qijcn7bSrNXqqKcfgDhpIscmNrVsO 4tLFgaI4RDqiAZyJOAdVbYH5m7nfLHG/R+6hyeUNRqvYE+sps+a1Sf7a0QttNkYAXcpAWWO YUpuq+Z2z1TOYu5Tc1/9Bm9cXmoFqMc6EGWTVHWP32KHdJxvHeJvIwLTLlcX0cAiyR9WbWe STHOIAOGzmr55rdCB44FMXym7rJfN0SBz0sbz5Jvzla6BNrWBct2Cb/Xq6EClDirarUEhKg vQ0iiCkhc9tZJK/KFmVlTDeUnQqL4ftTex9euDxDGFtpjXV76lm7rUiciYSA== Received: from [10.139.162.187] (helo=SmtpCorp) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPPL-cp4UQY-Cg for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:15:59 +0000 Received: from [10.83.151.206] (helo=zappa.graemes.com) by smtpcorp.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92-S2G) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPPL-4Xa7XX-00 for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:15:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.7.2] (duke.graemes.com [192.168.7.2]) (Authenticated sender: lists) by zappa.graemes.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EA97C0003A73 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:15:58 +0100 (BST) To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com From: Graeme Seaton Message-ID: <7072d246-960d-1d1b-be3f-04edb39e8033@graemes.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:15:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2EA97C0003A73 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.09 / 20.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.56734394202651]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-2.99)[99.96%] X-Rspamd-Server: zappa.graemes.com X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1keeeL4ba7bb00.-75Af4fok066U Feedback-ID: 297367m:297367aJZwe00:297367sEIS5Nbk23 X-Report-Abuse: Please forward a copy of this message, including all headers, to X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.354 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIMWL_WL_MED -0.001 DKIMwl.org - Medium trust sender DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pbs-devel] Templates starting on backup X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:16:10 -0000 Hi, I store my templates on a common host and move to deployment host as necessary.  Unfortunately, when backup up the process tries to start the template and then fails if there is a difference in the hardware configuration between the current host and it's definition. Given that templates (if I understand correctly) are not run directly shouldn't the backup just work with the images since there won't be any dirty blocks to be detected? Regards, Graeme