From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FFD94EE1
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:10:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7502B30F18
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:09:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:09:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B87B744216
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:09:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:09:48 +0200
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Message-ID: <5ms2zeg6l7c55n3roz67hdg7ipggb562q57uf5l72awmbeum4v@sgrbrmf2bfck>
References: <20240410141722.147895-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <20240410141722.147895-4-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <cqi2oxjjs2dataefjyge7gqlwmto3tin2egticwngreloghjad@b6342w56ebv6>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <cqi2oxjjs2dataefjyge7gqlwmto3tin2egticwngreloghjad@b6342w56ebv6>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.086 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox v3 3/3] proxmox-log: added tracing
 infra
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:19 -0000

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 04:17:17PM +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> 
> ↑
> should we keep these as #[deprecated] first for less churn and just map
> them to `warn/error/...!(tasklog = true, $($fmt)+)`?
> ↓

actually nvm this part, we don't use these outside of pbs code