From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED66B9094 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 20246176B2 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 27C4A43DEC for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58f47139-230c-45a2-a794-76939e480620@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:25:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20240305092703.126906-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <20240305092703.126906-30-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <1710241045.h2ym0ilnyj.astroid@yuna.none> From: Christian Ebner In-Reply-To: <1710241045.h2ym0ilnyj.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC v2 proxmox-backup 29/36] client: pxar: add previous reference to archiver X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:25:53 -0000 On 3/12/24 13:12, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > I wonder - do we really need such fine-grained control here? wouldn't a > simple per-backup job switch between metadata or not be enough? Would be sufficient for now, the idea was to be able to select which archives should be created with the metadata based mode if multiple archives are given for the run. But I can drop this additional complexity for now. Just wanted to make sure this is not to limited by setting it for the whole job.