From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451D368D58
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 16:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3B993C043
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 16:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2AD07C033
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Dec 2020 16:06:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E96C444CC7;
 Fri,  4 Dec 2020 16:06:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:05:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, 
 Niko Fellner <n.fellner@logics.de>
Message-ID: <540065904.947.1607094357033@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR09MB2754279488FDC8B0B4D7025FF2F10@AM0PR09MB2754.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM0PR09MB2754279488FDC8B0B4D7025FF2F10@AM0PR09MB2754.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev14
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.111 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [pull.rs, restore.rs]
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] parallelize restore.rs fn restore_image: problems
 in async move
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:06:03 -0000

as pointed out in the bug report, we already have such code in pull.rs

Why not use that instead of something new?

> On 12/04/2020 3:14 PM Niko Fellner <n.fellner@logics.de> wrote:
> 
>  
> In order to parallelize restore_image within restore.rs (#3163), I tried to make use of tokio: