From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C8062DBB for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4066F16594 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:23:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1DC1D16585 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DF54445439 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:23:09 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Dominik Csapak , Hannes Laimer , Dietmar Maurer References: <20200918090052.79979-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: <531614ab-ad43-a615-ef9f-2665ececa4cb@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:23:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/81.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.191 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 0/6] add scheduled verification of datastore X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:23:41 -0000 On 9/18/20 12:10 PM, Dominik Csapak wrote: > like we talked off-list > > verification schedules are wanted, but > we probably want to have them more like we have sync-jobs > independent of datastores > > (so we can have multiple verification schedules per datastore, > which will be important once we have parameters such as > 'verify only unverified snapshots') > > also please use the 'Job' helper for keeping track of the state > since that is cheaper than searching for the last time in the > task list > agree here. Dominik and I discussed this a bit and a schedule panel where one can not only add different schedules with different options but also one schedule for multiple/all datastores seems like better UX. It makes it easier to set "catch all" schedules, and get an overview over schedules. This includes things like adding a "next run" column, which would crowd the space in the datastore config grid a lot.