From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25E76889E for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:54:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBE572515A for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:54:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C9A822514E for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:54:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 980BF4605F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:54:08 +0100 (CET) To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= References: <20201110155927.2650445-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: <51915fa2-338c-646c-3c0e-f0d6a4f7f8c0@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:54:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/83.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201110155927.2650445-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.101 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] unbreak get_subscription without sshd installed X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:54:40 -0000 On 10.11.20 16:59, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote: > which might be the case e.g. in a PBS container >=20 rather breaks it further, as in, one cannot use subscriptions at all anymore... > Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler > --- >=20 > Notes: > we might want to switch to a different file as base? or even genera= te a file > just for the server ID derivation? using the openssh-server one has quite some advantages, be it only to avoid tampering. I'd for now suggest adding the diff below to the meta package - we can see if another option makes more sense for the next major release. btw, a specific container meta package like PMG has, without the kernel dependencies could make sense to add. ----8<---- diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index e88b965..d961da0 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ Maintainer: Proxmox Support Team Package: proxmox-backup Architecture: all Depends: libc6, + openssh-server, proxmox-archive-keyring, proxmox-backup-client, proxmox-backup-server, --