From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B28E71C63 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0F53194E7 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:04:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.upilab.com (mail.upilab.com [199.38.221.195]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1D792194DA for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 12:04:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.1.129] (UnknownHost) by mail.upilab.com with SMTP; Fri, 20 May 2022 06:04:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4a2d02a4-559a-a275-7843-803de9fa58ce@upilab.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 06:04:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <4934e0fe-26da-048e-973c-93c60ba3083b@proxmox.com> <5dc099cb-37ef-7eca-ff38-1502ec9ff8fa@upilab.com> From: David Lawley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.321 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.1 Message only has text/html MIME parts NICE_REPLY_A -0.717 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Proxmox Backup Server 2.2 available X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:05:04 -0000

thanks

On 5/20/2022 1:43 AM, Thomas Lampre= cht wrote:

On 19/05/2022 12:28, Davi=
d Lawley wrote:

Off hand going to guess=
 moving backups to a namespace not an easy task?=C2=A0 Or maybe there =
is a way?

As long as the backups stay in the same datastore it's relatively easy=
,
as that's just moving around folders. For cross datastore you need to =
use
sync-to-local-remote for now, as otherwise data chunk can be missing.

You could do the following on the CLI, note that it'd be best to enabl=
e
the new offline maintenance mode to avoid interfering with the PBS dae=
mons,
as this example ignores locking completely.

# change pwd to datastore root dir, e.g.:
cd /mnt/datastore
# create the namespace "foo" manually (or via gui, which doesn't needs=
 the ns/ prefix)
mkdir -p ns/foo

# ensure folder have correct owners to avoid issues on prune/delete
chown -R backup:backup ns

# move all groups of type vm, ct and host
mv vm ct host ns/foo

# or, move just a single group:
# first create the backup group type in the NS, if not already presen
mkdir ns/foo/vm
chown -R backup:backup ns/foo/vm
# move the group
mv vm/101 ns/foo/vm/

# or a deeper namespace "foo/bar"
mkdir -p ns/foo/ns/bar
chown -R backup:backup ns

Adapted from my post in
=
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-backup-server-2-2-available.=
109724/page-2#post-471949

cheers,
Thomas

--=20


A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humou=
r.=20
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in w=
ays that make no sense.=20
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you pai=
d to me to write this... ;)