From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FF37143B for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34E3D1265F for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:00:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 08C851264E for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:00:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D15D7465ED for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 19:00:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <487fd2f2-802b-2b59-0544-1ecc10c40353@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 19:00:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Dominik Csapak Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <20210514125923.14955-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20210514125923.14955-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <2e2480a1-1c71-2a53-6a38-1b7a39c17a02@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <2e2480a1-1c71-2a53-6a38-1b7a39c17a02@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.006 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 4/5] ui: tape/window/TapeRestore: enabling selecting multiple snapshots X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:00:46 -0000 On 18.05.21 09:00, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 14.05.21 14:59, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> by including the new snapshotselector. If a whole media-set is to be >> restored, select all snapshots >> >> to achieve this, we drop the 'restoreid' and 'datastores' properties >> for the restore window, and replace them by a 'prefilter' object >> (with 'store' and 'snapshot' properties) >> >> to be able to show the snapshots, we now have to always load the >> content of that media-set, so drop the short-circuit if we have >> the datastores already. >> >> also to improve space-usage, shift the datastores mapping grid in the >> right column, and all non datastore related options in the left one, >> showing the snapshot grid below >> (the datastore mapping is now limited to 150px; ~3 datastores, and scrollable) >> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak >> --- >> www/tape/BackupOverview.js | 27 +++------- >> www/tape/window/TapeRestore.js | 99 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) >> > Oh, and before I forget it, it irked me a bit that the content tree's expansion state was not restored after the store reloaded triggered due to the restore edit-window getting closed, all just got collapsed again. Maybe you can improve that? I'm not even sure that a reload is useful after the close, as any tape-restore itself did not alter the content there.