From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627E4671CE for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 539BB8B44 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C65B88B2C for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845DBA40381; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 89QdcO5dyXTS; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CEFA40384; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.panservice.it Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fJcKEmTXndtV; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C098A40381; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabrizio Cuseo Reply-To: Fabrizio Cuseo To: Dietmar Maurer Cc: pbs-devel Message-ID: <40489559.79435.1598368711511.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> In-Reply-To: <756044694.61.1598368328815@webmail.proxmox.com> References: <526549844.77739.1598365340730.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <756044694.61.1598368328815@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [212.66.96.48] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC84 (Win)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm Thread-Index: mlVfBZjBPzIBsqew+JVPTCrnA691fQ== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:18:33 -0000 Yes, I am making a lot of tests, and with a vanilla 4.9 centOS i don't have the problem. But the strange is that with the old (full) pve backup, i have no problems. I use ext3 filesystem (not xfs). Now I am trying to rsync the old content to a new vm (rsync /) so the filesystem descriptors are new, but the content is the old one. Thanks, Fabrizio PS: i am using for test a vm with pbs, and for repository a MooseFS filesystem with 120Tbyte. ----- Il 25-ago-20, alle 17:12, Dietmar Maurer dietmar@proxmox.com ha scritto: >> I have a problem with a 4.9 centOS vm. If i restore after backup, during the >> initial FSCK there are a lot of errors and filesystem problems. >> >> I have tried to: >> - change disk from virtio to IDE >> - backup with vm off >> - make fsck, stop the vm, backup, and restore >> >> If i backup the vm powered off, when I restore it, no fsck is prompted at boot, >> but if I reset (without any activity) the vm, again the filesystem is full of >> errors. >> If I reset the original VM, no problem during fsck at boot. >> >> If i fix the restored vm, I backup it again (powered on or off), same problem. >> >> So seems the the problem is making and restoring backup. >> >> No problem with a centOS 6.X (i am testing other OS versions). >> >> Some idea ? > > file system on centos 4.9 is buggy (old xfs version)?