From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9026177D
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:54:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D32E0174FF
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:54:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C5476174F3
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 94D1A45E3E
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
References: <20201020091012.82723-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <3aee569e-0906-52cc-2e32-0f3961f1e341@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:54:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201020091012.82723-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.128 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 00/10] add job
 based verify scheduling
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:54:02 -0000

On 20.10.20 11:10, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> Replaces the first implementation of scheduled verification with a new
> job-based version with additional options that may be specified through=

> the web ui.
>=20
> Options available for verification jobs:
>  * schedule when to run the job
>  * set datastore on which the job should run
>  * set a number of days after which a verification becomes "outdated"
>     empty =3D> verifications are valid forever
>  * specify if already successfuly verified snapshots should be verified=

>     again even if they're not outdated(failed ones will always be done)=

>=20


applied, thanks!

Note regarding my reply from yesterday:
Dominik is checking on a idea to move that stuff into each datastore cont=
ent
and I'll try to make the IDs from this and sync jobs at least optional, o=
r
remove them all together (the only real use for them is that we can inclu=
de
them in the task log).