From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC721FF179 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:02:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2339D1482D; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:02:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <392975f8-252d-4d62-ab8c-adffe591343a@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:02:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Maximiliano Sandoval References: <20251209105252.241312-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <231a296e-bb8f-4c27-a85e-365e47c534d4@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1765357359200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [rust-lang.org] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/8] cargo: bump msrv to 1.87 X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Cc: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" Am 10.12.25 um 09:40 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval: > Thomas Lamprecht writes: > >> Am 09.12.25 um 11:53 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval: >>> proxmox-fixed-string uses std::str::from_utf8_unchecked which was >>> stabilized on 1.87, see its announcement [1]. >>> >>> [1] https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/05/15/Rust-1.87.0/ >> >> Shouldn't proxmox-fixed-string then get that msrv bump though? > > We can do that, but then it becomes a bit unruly to manage a per crate > msrv. I'll send a patch doing that. IMO having to manually track where a dependency that requires higher msrv is used is *much* harder and error prone than declaring that relation for where it's actually used. I.e., with your patch we're still missing PDM, pve-rs, ...? On the contrary, if you declare dependency info for proxmox-fixed-string, then debcargo will automatically generate a d/control dependency relation like: rustc:native (>= 1.87) , Thus everything using that as build-dependency will get ensure the correct rustc version is installed for all users of that crate, not just one. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel