From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2065C0B04
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AAF091E5B9
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6612D4531E;
 Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <37eda11f-9b26-412f-a15d-a17f8ef7d235@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:09:00 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Content-Language: en-US
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20240111104036.3341854-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20240111104036.3341854-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <406216126.2803.1705044558912@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <be39bad5-280a-4520-9025-eb3023c2277e@proxmox.com>
 <1870891247.2813.1705046488867@webmail.proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1870891247.2813.1705046488867@webmail.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/5] tape: handle duplicate
 label-texts in inventory
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:09:32 -0000

On 1/12/24 09:01, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>>> That is far more confusing than before, isnt it?
>>
>> but don't actually know which of the one in the inventory it is?
>> we only have the label and simple chose the first before, but that might be the wrong one...
> 
> I see the problem. Still, this is very confusing...

exactly, this is why the later patches prevent duplicate labels
and we now put out a warning into the syslog every time we encounter this...