From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AE4D49C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:09:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5818420F91
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:09:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:09:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1B9E449B5
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:09:23 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <378ec591-f9e8-6263-2aae-bfdcc3c1797d@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:09:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/108.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20221129164019.1193392-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
 <16d7b3cb-7887-58c9-6514-9fc18400a78e@proxmox.com>
 <798cf744-7051-8458-4a3e-67145e7741f8@proxmox.com>
 <f0567912-df1d-0a53-d294-0eaaeba3d3a2@proxmox.com>
 <a94d0dcf-e1bc-a621-6a42-8b29f1552ee2@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <a94d0dcf-e1bc-a621-6a42-8b29f1552ee2@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.101 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.258 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] email_notifications: make
 html template more valid
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:09:25 -0000

Am 30/11/2022 um 16:19 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
> ill add it if we go with the "keep the full html structure" option
> instead of the "<pre>-only" one =F0=9F=98=84

If we change this I'd prefer a "full" HTML structure. Not much of a point=
 in
over-optimization here, and _if_ some client renders this badly, and the =
user
checks the source of the mail and sees missing tags or the like, the tech=
nicality
of it being valid w3c; we highly probably still will be the one blamed fi=
rst.

Anyhow, if there's no known (and not totally obscure) MUA that has issues=
 with the
current form I'd avoid touching it.