From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871986958C for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F1B911175 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8754911167 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B66EA401B8 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id omKJ00Tll4IB for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC76CA401FB for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.panservice.it Received: from zimbra.panservice.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.panservice.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lj3Ee-bm6hEy for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.panservice.it (zimbra.panservice.it [212.66.96.48]) by zimbra.panservice.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6522A401B8 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:13:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabrizio Cuseo Reply-To: Fabrizio Cuseo To: pbs-devel Message-ID: <369313826.188886.1598857992203.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> In-Reply-To: <2557d55e-0852-f429-0615-6add19f29626@proxmox.com> References: <526549844.77739.1598365340730.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <756044694.61.1598368328815@webmail.proxmox.com> <817775127.98335.1598444804482.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <2557d55e-0852-f429-0615-6add19f29626@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [212.66.96.48] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC85 (Win)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm Thread-Index: fw5x16tKR7N8O0zaCyl+jdQuUi8TxQ== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL 0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [panservice.it, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Problem with PBS and old CentOS 4.9 vm X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:13:44 -0000 No problems with old backup procedure. But i don't use CT, is a VM. ----- Il 31-ago-20, alle 9:07, Fabian Ebner f.ebner@proxmox.com ha scritto: > Hi, > are there any problems when you backup to a non-PBS storage? Could > https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2528 be related? > > Am 26.08.20 um 14:26 schrieb Fabrizio Cuseo: >> There is something strange.. >> >> Vanilla CentOS 4.9 (32 bit), backup, restore, fsck, no problem >> I have copied (rsync) the content of my old centos 4.9 machine (but rsync, so >> the filesystem is new and clean) to the vanilla 4.9 >> Backup, restore, some problems with fsck >> Backup (powered off), restore, power on, reset, power on, fsck, problems with >> fsck >> >> Seems that during backup (and restore) something goes wrong with filesystem... >> >> The vm is on ceph with virtio drivers. >> >> Regards, Fabrizio >> >> ----- Il 25-ago-20, alle 17:12, Dietmar Maurer dietmar@proxmox.com ha scritto: >> >>>> I have a problem with a 4.9 centOS vm. If i restore after backup, during the >>>> initial FSCK there are a lot of errors and filesystem problems. >>>> >>>> I have tried to: >>>> - change disk from virtio to IDE >>>> - backup with vm off >>>> - make fsck, stop the vm, backup, and restore >>>> >>>> If i backup the vm powered off, when I restore it, no fsck is prompted at boot, >>>> but if I reset (without any activity) the vm, again the filesystem is full of >>>> errors. >>>> If I reset the original VM, no problem during fsck at boot. >>>> >>>> If i fix the restored vm, I backup it again (powered on or off), same problem. >>>> >>>> So seems the the problem is making and restoring backup. >>>> >>>> No problem with a centOS 6.X (i am testing other OS versions). >>>> >>>> Some idea ? >>> >>> file system on centos 4.9 is buggy (old xfs version)? >> > > > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel -- --- Fabrizio Cuseo - mailto:f.cuseo@panservice.it Direzione Generale - Panservice InterNetWorking Servizi Professionali per Internet ed il Networking Panservice e' associata AIIP - RIPE Local Registry Phone: +39 0773 410020 - Fax: +39 0773 470219 http://www.panservice.it mailto:info@panservice.it Numero verde nazionale: 800 901492