From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF4770F34
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 09:53:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F69A25A37
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 09:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 804AC25A2C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 09:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E78F04362B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 17 May 2022 09:52:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <32ae4cc4-38cc-777d-38c8-2f53131a1cf3@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 09:52:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/101.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20220517070522.432890-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220517070522.432890-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.019 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] ui: window/SyncJobEdit:
 don't send 'id' on edit
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 07:53:10 -0000

Am 5/17/22 um 09:05 scriber Dominik Csapak:
> we cannot change the id, and even if we send the same, the backend
> does not allow 'duplicate' parameters (the id is in the url already)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/window/SyncJobEdit.js | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

But change this to a displayEdit field instead to avoid having a advanced checkbox/area but
no field in there shown and also fixed verify jobs, which had the same problem..