From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59787BA81D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:50:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 399FB18C1D for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:50:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:50:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6271247637 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:50:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <2d73c2db-5f2b-4a3f-85a9-7b7c5f7c2eed@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:50:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Lukas Wagner , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Dominik Csapak References: <20231123130652.416129-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> <20231123130652.416129-2-f.schauer@proxmox.com> <0f719e51-3407-4923-bd22-502efb4bca4d@proxmox.com> <9efec590-7ab0-4108-b321-896f069f7929@proxmox.com> From: Filip Schauer In-Reply-To: <9efec590-7ab0-4108-b321-896f069f7929@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.152 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox 1/1] fix #4995: compression: Include symlinks in zip file restore X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:50:51 -0000 Patch v3 available: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/2023-December/007538.html On 24/11/2023 12:03, Lukas Wagner wrote: > On 11/24/23 08:56, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> * if you want to go the extra mile, i guess this would be a good time >> to add tests >>    that create a new zip from test data, to see if they don't break >> with your changes >> > > I agree! > > I think writing tests for changes should be the default and not be > considered as 'the extra mile' - especially considering that it should > be relatively easy to write tests for this crate (no weird > dependencies, no need to run as a certain user, etc.) >