From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222FA1FF168 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:48:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 546DE4E2; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:48:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <2cae33de-6348-46b1-8986-98d2e45e8a1c@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:48:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <20241126122419.235890-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <1d5d8a7b-f31c-4f1a-bc69-814e57455e3d@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Christian Ebner In-Reply-To: <1d5d8a7b-f31c-4f1a-bc69-814e57455e3d@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] api types: add missing conf to blob archive name mapping X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" On 11/26/24 13:35, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 26.11.24 um 13:24 schrieb Christian Ebner: >> Commit addfae26 ("api types: introduce `BackupArchiveName` type") >> introduced a dedicated archive name api type to add rust type >> checking and bundle helpers to the api type. Since this, the backup >> archive name to server archive name mapping is handled by its parser. > > This is mostly relevant for the client or? I.e., this has no impact on > community implementations/experiments adding completely different archive > types? No, this is not limited to the client. This is mostly used server side to map the archive name extension to the server archive name extension (.blob, .fidx, .didx). The current mappings were already enforced/assumed by the server to some extend, and other archive types must use the full server archive name extension anyways, for the server to recognize it. For community implementations: they will be affected by this as well, but they would already have need to pass the full server archive name extensions anyways. So this should not break anything for them. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel