From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1738360221 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:15:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0088F1CD6 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:15:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.upilab.com (mail.upilab.com [199.38.221.195]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C89261CA7 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:15:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.1.103] (UnknownHost) by mail.upilab.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: <29d2b54c-4ba2-5ee4-4a51-77d0c3e9f022@upilab.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:14:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <58e99d25-32de-7446-64b4-b6a3262f648c@upilab.com> From: David Lawley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.423 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.1 Message only has text/html MIME parts NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] PBS and multiple clsuters X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:15:36 -0000

"avoiding backup naming conflicts" pretty much covers it,

thanks Thomas

On 1/12/2022 6:47 AM, Thomas Lampre= cht wrote:
On 12.01.22 12:14, David =
Lawley wrote:

Just a note and others =
may have found a way to work with this.. And I feel sure=20
its nothing that has gone unnoticed.

If I have 2 or more proxmox environments, you can have multiple VMs wi=
th same=20
name, such as vm/102

Would be nice to have a method to determine what cluster the backup be=
longs to.

I have restored a VM to the wrong cluster before.


Not really sure what the actual question or statement here is, but a n=
amespace
feature is on the roadmap:

https://pbs.proxmox.com/wiki/index.php/Ro=
admap#Roadmap

cheers,
Thomas




--=20


A quick word on style. I have none.
I have casual way of talking and writing, and a strange sense of humou=
r.=20
I also tend to use random pop-culture references a lot, but often in w=
ays that make no sense.=20
If this is a problem you are entitled to a refund of the money you pai=
d to me to write this... ;)