From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440FE6B532
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:19:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F381185E4
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:19:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BCD99185D6
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:19:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8AC114611B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:19:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:19:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <24176474.1113.1611670743879@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <59a97491-9f67-d2ee-b6eb-ecfe508c45e0@proxmox.com>
References: <20210125153057.30061-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20210125153057.30061-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <1494979937.1102.1611661423023@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <59a97491-9f67-d2ee-b6eb-ecfe508c45e0@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev16
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.116 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/4] api2/types/tape/drive:
 add changer_slot
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:19:50 -0000


> On 01/26/2021 1:10 PM Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> On 1/26/21 12:43 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > I am confused. IMHO, A drive never belongs to a slot.
> 
> ok, maybe bad terminology, but a drive inside a changer
> has a changer_drive_id, which corresponds to the
> 'entry-id' we get for the changer status
> (i called that changer-slot)
> 
> what should i call it instead?

I use "drivenum" in the code.

also see "man mtx"