From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBDDB3A68
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1460372B6
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A8D740984
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:28 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <23192e11-62f4-466a-ab35-bdd6f08b453d@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20231129121423.70408-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <902c3e23-b1eb-413d-88b9-0f6d1b1cebf5@proxmox.com>
 <fbbdf044-e765-4ee8-ba74-1a90b2c1a95e@proxmox.com>
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <fbbdf044-e765-4ee8-ba74-1a90b2c1a95e@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.184 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] cli: add interactive
 confirmation for block device wipe
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:08:29 -0000

On 11/29/23 14:04, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> "y" and "n", since
>> there are some locales where "y" and "n" doesn't exist...
>> Was there some decision made off-list?
> not really, at least not that I remember, for now let's just ignore that
> (but would be great if we (you) try to remember this when cleaning that up)
yep, will do!