From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FB7F1FF0E1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 52C9C21677; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <2283203b-3ea9-4bf8-8575-390758a07472@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:30:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 2/5] d/control: depend on tools used by the system report To: Erik Fastermann , pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260730101349.217371-1-e.fastermann@proxmox.com> <20260730101349.217371-3-e.fastermann@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Christian Ebner In-Reply-To: <20260730101349.217371-3-e.fastermann@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1786364993662 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.887 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: N7LLIG2RYHUXHDRLM3K47RVPR2IYUBTM X-Message-ID-Hash: N7LLIG2RYHUXHDRLM3K47RVPR2IYUBTM X-MailFrom: c.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 7/30/26 12:13 PM, Erik Fastermann wrote: > The report runs ethtool per physical interface, top (package procps) > for the load section and proxmox-boot-tool (package > proxmox-kernel-helper) for the ESP status, none of which were depended > on directly. > > proxmox-kernel-helper is a recommendation rather than a direct > dependency, as proxmox-boot-tool is not required on systems which are > not running a Proxmox kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Erik Fastermann > --- > debian/control | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 1ddb7c481..2ef403a7b 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets > Package: proxmox-backup-server > Architecture: any > Depends: dmidecode, > + ethtool, > fonts-font-awesome, > gdisk, > iproute2, > @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ Depends: dmidecode, > pbs-i18n, > pciutils, > postfix | mail-transport-agent, > + procps, > proxmox-backup-docs, > proxmox-enterprise-support-keyring, > proxmox-mini-journalreader (>= 1.7), > @@ -223,6 +225,7 @@ Depends: dmidecode, > ${misc:Depends}, > ${shlibs:Depends}, > Recommends: ifupdown2, > + proxmox-kernel-helper, > proxmox-mail-forward, > proxmox-network-interface-pinning, > proxmox-offline-mirror-helper, needs a rebase