From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2763177B05 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:45:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 156C01170C for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 05A9E116FB for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C4E6346489 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:44:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Message-ID: <2035643007.1328.1619624679511@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev9 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.417 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] tools/http: make user agent configurable X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:45:15 -0000 Ignore me, I miss-read your patch. Anyhow, my plan was to work towards are more generic client. IMHO it does not harm to expose such things. But yes, we do not use it currently. > On 04/28/2021 5:31 PM Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > > On 04/28/2021 4:23 PM Wolfgang Bumiller wrote: > > > > > > Do we really need to have more than 1 user agent string in what's > > basically a non-exported utility, though? > > I though that suggestion came from you?