From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 234E71FF143 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C355751B8; Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:52:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: c.ebner@proxmox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 10/27] api: config: add endpoints for encryption key manipulation Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20260411085154.1961287-4-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260410165454.1578501-11-c.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20260411085154.1961287-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1775897454850 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: E4X32EBF6YH4F3VX4YUIRW4K27FVXAXV X-Message-ID-Hash: E4X32EBF6YH4F3VX4YUIRW4K27FVXAXV X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 10.04.26 um 18:54 schrieb Christian Ebner: > diff --git a/src/api2/config/encryption_keys.rs b/src/api2/config/encryption_keys.rs > @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ > > +pub fn create_key( > + id: String, > + key: Option, > + _rpcenv: &mut dyn RpcEnvironment, > +) -> Result { > + let key_config = if let Some(key) = &key { > + serde_json::from_str(key) > + .map_err(|err| format_err!("failed to parse provided key: {err}"))? > + } else { nit: might want to do a trial decrypt here (like check_privs_and_load does) to catch broken uploads early instead of only at first sync run. > +fn encryption_key_in_use(id: &str) -> Result, Error> { > + let job_with_key = list.iter().find(|job| { nit: this returns only the first matching job. Showing all affected jobs in the error message would be nicer for the admin to repeatedly running into this for each such job.