From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8441FF16E
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:09:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5FD1C3693D;
Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:09:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:09:29 +0200
Message-Id: <20250414150929.639930-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.096 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox] router: format: add newline at the end
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Without this newline running commands with missing arguments, e.g.
```
proxmox-backup-client backup
```
will print their usage string without a newline at the end, which is
costing me my sanity.
As per [1], usage shouldn't contain trailing new lines and this in
principle should not print double new lines.
[1] https://git.proxmox.com/?p=proxmox.git;a=commit;h=d872eb9d7ebadbd8fcc9506eb2c5689632fa89bc
Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
---
proxmox-router/src/cli/format.rs | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/proxmox-router/src/cli/format.rs b/proxmox-router/src/cli/format.rs
index 95448aa9..e8ebe41f 100644
--- a/proxmox-router/src/cli/format.rs
+++ b/proxmox-router/src/cli/format.rs
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ pub(crate) fn print_simple_usage_error_do<'cli>(
&[],
global_options_iter,
);
- eprint!("Error: {}\nUsage: {}", err_msg, usage);
+ eprintln!("Error: {}\nUsage: {}", err_msg, usage);
}
/// Print command usage for nested commands to ``stderr``.
--
2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel