From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B985D1FF16B
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:07:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F888A73B;
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:07:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:07:19 +0100
Message-Id: <20241128160721.583578-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/3] api types: version: drop
unused `repoid` field
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pbs-devel" <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
The `ApiVersion` type was introduced in commit a926803b
("api/api-types: refactor api endpoint version, add api types")
including the `repoid`, added for completeness when converting from
a pre-existing `ApiVersionInfo` instance, as returned by the
`version` api endpoint.
Drop the additional `repoid` field, since this is currently not used,
can be obtained fro the `ApiVersionInfo` as well and only hinders the
implementation for easy api version comparison.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
changes since version 1:
- not present in previous version
pbs-api-types/src/version.rs | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pbs-api-types/src/version.rs b/pbs-api-types/src/version.rs
index 80f87e372..bd4c517da 100644
--- a/pbs-api-types/src/version.rs
+++ b/pbs-api-types/src/version.rs
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ pub struct ApiVersion {
pub major: ApiVersionMajor,
pub minor: ApiVersionMinor,
pub release: ApiVersionRelease,
- pub repoid: String,
}
impl TryFrom<ApiVersionInfo> for ApiVersion {
@@ -64,7 +63,6 @@ impl TryFrom<ApiVersionInfo> for ApiVersion {
major,
minor,
release,
- repoid: value.repoid.clone(),
})
}
}
--
2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel