From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA247611C9 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CDD5F2F599 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2879B2F586 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DC68644BD4 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:22 +0100 (CET) From: Dominik Csapak To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:12:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20220204091221.1781533-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20220204091221.1781533-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20220204091221.1781533-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.160 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] traffic-control: add debug log when we found a matching rule X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:12:53 -0000 Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- optional, at least one user in the forum has a problem with traffic control, this could help debug that in the future... src/cached_traffic_control.rs | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/cached_traffic_control.rs b/src/cached_traffic_control.rs index 2f077d36..cd13bc1b 100644 --- a/src/cached_traffic_control.rs +++ b/src/cached_traffic_control.rs @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ impl TrafficControlCache { Some((rule, _)) => { match self.limiter_map.get(&rule.config.name) { Some((read_limiter, write_limiter)) => { + log::debug!("found traffic control rule for {:?} : {}", peer_ip, &rule.config.name); (&rule.config.name, read_limiter.clone(), write_limiter.clone()) } None => ("", None, None), // should never happen -- 2.30.2