From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2600A775BB for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:56:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0FF7882E9 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 45D7282DB for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1A86F46939 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:56:11 +0200 From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: Dominik Csapak Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <20211022085611.fun3ybyqwqqwu6bu@olga.proxmox.com> References: <20211021091212.2157971-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211021091212.2157971-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.598 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [acme.rs, proxmox.com] Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] acme: interpret no TOS as accepted X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:56:45 -0000 applied On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:12:12AM +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote: > some custom ACME endpoints do not have TOS, interpret this as > 'the user has accepted the TOS', like we do for PVE. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak > --- > probably needs the proxmox-acme-rs patch from [0] to work in all cases > 0: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/2021-October/001867.html > > src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs b/src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs > index 8d929d38..ecf7b2b2 100644 > --- a/src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs > +++ b/src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs > @@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ async fn register_account( > false > } > } else { > - false > + println!("No Terms of Service found, proceeding."); > + true > }; > > println!("Attempting to register account with {:?}...", directory); > -- > 2.30.2