From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DED3749BA for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B493B733 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 545FBB729 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26FF5466E9 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Csapak To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:54:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20210602135425.27990-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.045 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] server/prune_job: fix locking during prune jobs X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 13:54:27 -0000 removing the backup dir must acquire the snapshot lock, else it can happen that we remove a snapshot while it is being restored or backed up to tape the original commit that adds the force flag (c9756b40d1b33c573216f7c8eba209200c1d9bd5) mentions that the prune checks itself if the snapshot is in use, but i could not find such code, so simply set force to false to avoid failing and aborting the prune job, warn if it could not and continue Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- src/server/prune_job.rs | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/server/prune_job.rs b/src/server/prune_job.rs index 572f1b04..ac56d167 100644 --- a/src/server/prune_job.rs +++ b/src/server/prune_job.rs @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ use crate::{ server::jobstate::Job, server::WorkerTask, task_log, + task_warn, }; pub fn do_prune_job( @@ -67,7 +68,14 @@ pub fn do_prune_job( info.backup_dir.backup_time_string() ); if !keep { - datastore.remove_backup_dir(&info.backup_dir, true)?; + if let Err(err) = datastore.remove_backup_dir(&info.backup_dir, false) { + task_warn!( + worker, + "failed to remove dir {:?}: {}", + info.backup_dir.relative_path(), + err, + ); + } } } } -- 2.20.1